All businesses speak about speed, efficiency, and SLAs, but in the background, delays in processing documents affect productivity daily, with no visible evidence. Invoices are pending approval, and all HR requests are being filtered through a Human Resources department that constantly uses checklists while contracts continue circulating back and forth between departments, creating multiple delays. Due to these inefficiencies of not being able to see where the delays are coming from, operational efficiencies are negatively impacted.
The perception in fast-moving companies is that they’re not dealing with paperwork but instead with decisions being made as a result of numerous processes attempting to work at once. Therefore, when workflow processes begin to slow down, it will not only impact the productivity of that department, but it will also substantially increase overall operational/financial losses to all departments.
The Real Cost of Document Processing Delays
Most organisations frequently underestimate how much time they lose through inefficient processing of documents. Studies consistently show that the majority of knowledge workers spend between 20-30% of their workday searching for documents, waiting for approvals, and manually re-entering data into systems. This equates to around one whole working day each week that is wasted, not due to lack of hard work, but due to ineffective processes in place.
When documents are processed slowly:
- Missed SLAs
- Longer wait times for customers
- Chasing updates among internal teams
- Loss of visibility for managers
- Increased errors due to rework
Delays like these do not just impact one department; they reverberate through all areas of the business.
Common Causes of Document Workflow Delays
- Manual Review and Handling
One problem that plagues many companies using manual document processing is that every step depends on a human picking up a document; whether it’s a cut from paper, a scanned image, or an e-mail attachment, the person responsible for processing must open, read, verify, and send on the document manually. This results in a potential bottleneck, particularly during peak times, such as the end-of-month closing and onboarding processes.
In addition, manual reviews tend to introduce more errors. For example, if the reviewer misses one field in the document or makes an error during data entry, the document may need to go back to the beginning of the processing cycle, causing delays that multiply.
- Approval Chains Managed Over Email
Document approval by way of e-mail is also typically the biggest delay in the workflow process. A document may be lost in lengthy e-mail threads, or an approver may have overlooked a message or two, and thus, no clear ownership or timeline exists. Additionally, if a team member is out of the office, the entire process may stall without anyone realising it has happened.
Without using a shared database, companies typically spend hours trying to track a document—” Has it been approved?”—when they could be doing actual work instead.
- Re-Entering the Same Data Multiple Times
Finally, in many organisations, the information contained in documents must be re-entered into various systems by employees (ERP, HRMS, CRM, accounting tools); this repetitive process not only slows down the processing cycle, but it also makes inconsistencies more likely. Each time data must be re-entered, the possibility of an error increases, ultimately resulting in audits, corrections and escalations.
Department-Wise Impact of Slow Document Processing
- Finance Teams
Finance departments have to contend with significant delays in the approval process, which cause long delays in invoice processing, create negative impacts on vendor relationships and result in the potential for late payment penalties. Additionally, month-end close times are extended, preventing management from obtaining timely financial information about the company. Delays of only 2 to 3 days per cycle can result in dozens of hours lost for every employee in a month.
- HR Departments
For HR teams, productivity is impacted during the onboarding process, payroll changes and through the verification of compliance documentation. The manual verification of documentation delays the start date for new hires, frustrates new employees and increases administrative burden. Ultimately, HR professionals find themselves spending more time chasing down documents for new employees and less time supporting these individuals.
- Operations and Supply Chain
The operations side of a business requires the timely movement of documents, including purchase orders, delivery notes and certification of compliance. Without timely documentation, production may be stopped, shipments delayed or coordination with suppliers interrupted. The loss of productivity in operations nearly always translates directly into loss of revenue.
Quantifying the Productivity Loss
Even conservative industry estimates reveal the costly impact of inefficient document handling and follow-up procedures.
The following statistics reflect how much of a problem this is:
- 5-10 hours per employee per week are lost to document handling and waiting for follow-ups.
- 30-40% of rework is due to the way manual documents are processed.
- Cycle times can be up to 25% longer when approvals occur via email.
- More escalation of routine tasks is being referred to higher management companies.
A 100-employee organisation could lose thousands of hours of productive time every year through poor document handling, and this would be valuable time that could have been used for growing the company, being innovative, or providing better customer service.
How Automation Eliminates Document Processing Delays
By re-evaluating how documents are handled digitally from start to finish, businesses today have found ways to eliminate waiting times associated with the physical handling of documents.
Faster Processing
Utilising automated technology allows for documents to be captured, classified, and processed instantly. When all human intervention during processing and/or review is removed, processing speeds can decrease by 50-70%.
Complete Visibility
With an automated workflow system in place, each document can have its own status, owner, and timeline, eliminating the need for teams to chase their supervisors for formalised approvals on each item. Managers will now be able to monitor their entire team’s activity for bottlenecks as the team member misses their deadline.
Bottleneck Removal
Routing rules allow documents to automatically route to the next appropriate recipient at the appropriate time. When a document is delayed due to a failure by one person to approve it, escalations can be triggered without further direct follow-up action required by the routing manager.
Why DMS + BPM + IDP Work Best Together
To address issues with documentation delays, multiple tools are necessary.
A Document Management System (DMS) centralises the storage, access, and version control of documents.
Business Process Management (BPM) supports automated workflows, approvals, and escalations associated with documents.
Intelligent Document Processing (IDP) utilises artificial intelligence and Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to provide accurate and efficient extraction of data from documents.
Together, these solutions create a unified, seamless document workflow where documents flow freely and easily between capture, processing, approval, and archive.
Utilising this combination of automated document management systems also creates greater predictability, accountability, and speed of business operations.
From Delays to Decisions—The Productivity Shift
Automated document processing transforms teams from reactive mode to proactive; faster Finance closing, smoother HR onboarding and fewer friction points between Operations activities. The result is that all levels of Management can have confidence that work is flowing and the business can support increased demand at all times.
Delays associated with document processing are not only operational issues; they are a major productivity crisis that has remained undetected.
Conclusion
Delays within document processing may appear small, but in reality, they are a contributing factor to decreased business productivity because of missed SLAs, delays in approvals, and multiple instances of recreating the same work. Delayed processing occurs by virtue of the manual management and email-based approval, as well as no clear visibility available to the teams working on those documents. By adopting DMS, BPM and IDP and combining their strengths through document automation, an organisation can eliminate bottlenecks, improve the speed of its workflow, and convert documents from a source of delay to active drivers of increased efficiency and growth for the company.
FAQs
What are document processing delays?
Document Processing Delays occur when a business is unable to process a document in time due to manual processing, slow approvals, or breaks in the processing system. This means that business documents take much longer than expected to complete the review, approval, or execution stages of the document.
How do document processing delays affect business productivity?
Document Processing Delays result in lost hours of work, missed service level agreements (SLAs), excessive rework, and delays in getting documents approved, which all result in a measurable reduction in productivity for the business.
What causes slow document processing in organisations?
The major reasons for Document Processing Delays are due to manual processing of documents, processed and approved through email, multiple entries of the same data, and the inability to provide workflow visibility.
Which departments are most impacted by document workflow delays?
As the majority of the time that these delays occur impacts Finance, Human Resources, and Operations, when they are unable to receive timely approval, have accurate data available to them, and/or are dependent upon the approval of documents to move their processes forward.
How much productivity is lost due to slow document processing?
On average, a business will lose 5 to 10 hours a week due to the internal processing of documents, causing follow-ups, lost documents, and excessive rework related to the manual processing of documents.